Mrs. Davis Overflows with Fascinating Ideas Even as It Struggles to Tie Them Together

1 year ago 9

There are times when it feels like Peacock’s “Mrs. Davis,” launching with four episodes this week before dropping one a week on the streaming service, feels like it could take place in the same world as the wildly successful HBO adaptation of “Watchmen.” It’s undeniably influenced by that project, one that saw writer Damon Lindelof’s brilliant voice tied to the incredible source material about heroism, responsibility, and the forces that shape society. In “Mrs. Davis,” Lindelof, working with co-creator Tara Hernandez ("The Big Bang Theory"), is tackling nothing less than the two biggest structures of the modern world: faith and technology. Like "Watchmen," it’s an unpredictable genre hybrid that takes giant swings at big ideas. That it misses some of them feels almost like a compliment but given Lindelof’s track record with projects like “Lost,” “Watchmen,” and “The Leftovers” (my pick for the best show of the 2010s), it’s hard not to be a little frustrated by how often “Mrs. Davis” raises ideas without grounding them or tying them together. It’s a show that can be more exhausting than enlightening, even if it feels sacrilegious to complain about a program that’s trying too to do much in an era when so many streaming offerings aren’t trying to do anything at all.

The phenomenal Betty Gilpin ("GLOW") stars as Simone, a nun who has committed her life to Jay (Andy McQueen), a magnetic figure who works a diner, makes falafel for Simone, and gives her tickets for jobs to do from his boss, an unseen force behind the kitchen door. The tickets are targets for Simone to unmask. For example, in the premiere she shows up in time to stop a group of magicians from pulling a scam on someone—people who use artifice and trickery to diminish the role of belief in this world. Simone is ultimately given a big target—Mrs. Davis, an A.I like Siri or Alexa that has become part of the fabric of the entire U.S. population. Mrs. Davis seems like a force for good, especially in the way the program encourages acts of kindness to give users “wings” that identify them as decent people, but Simone knows there’s something wrong with an A.I. this powerful, and not only because it kind of feels like worshipping a false God.

Got that? It’s just the tip of a narrative iceberg that’s almost impossible to put into a plot summary paragraph. I didn’t even get to the cowboy named Wiley (Jake McDorman), Simone’s ex-boyfriend who leads a group of action-movie-quoting muscle men who form a resistance of their own against Mrs. Davis. Or what about Simone’s parents? Her dad (David Arquette) was a magician who died doing an impossible trick, but her mom (Elizabeth Marvel), a security expert now, doesn’t think pop is really gone. And most of the plotting is driven by Simone trying to get her hands on the Holy Grail, which will lead to Simone’s demise. Yeah, that Holy Grail. If that’s not enough belief-driven plotting, there’s even a character named Schrodinger (Ben Chaplin). And he’s got a cat.

The main thing that holds “Mrs. Davis” together thematically is iconography. Just the image of a nun and a cowboy traversing the globe conjures themes of religion, Americana, heroism, faith, etc. Muscle men, a magician, the Knights Templar, even the Holy Grail—it’s almost as if Lindelof was done unpacking the role of the hero image in society and so decided to ask himself what else drives culture, good or bad. It results in a show that’s overflowing with ideas that don’t always gel into a coherent whole. It sometimes feels like its ambition can get tangled, tying ideas together in a way that’s more haphazard than insightful, such as the fourth episode, which dives right into the religious center of the world in a way that ultimately feels hollow.

And yet maybe that’s the point of it all? You can't tie this all together because there's nothing to hold onto. I wouldn’t go as far as to say that “Mrs. Davis” is blasphemous. On the contrary, it regularly delineates between faith and organized religion, valuing the former over the latter. It’s more a deconstruction of what matters to us in this life, and how that has to shift when we cede control over so many of our decisions, values, and choices to something like an all-powerful A.I. For centuries, human beings have allowed key aspects of their life to be driven by religion, but what happens when technology has that same kind of world-shaping power? It’s an important question that feels like creative geniuses like Lindelof will be asking for years to come.

While “Mrs. Davis” sometimes feels like it lacks the teeth or focus to really land, it is never anything less than fascinating, even when it’s frustrating. It helps that Lindelof and Hernandez found a performer as fearless as Gilpin, who carries the show with her blend of badass confidence and vulnerability. There aren’t many of her generation who could sell a character that’s equal parts faith and force like Gilpin. She makes choices here that can be invigorating, even when her character sometimes feels underdeveloped because of the requirements of the breakneck plotting.

About that plotting, “Mrs. Davis” has a habit of raising ideas only to drift off to the next one, like an A.I. that’s been so overstuffed with code that it’s glitching. Again, maybe that’s the point of it all. With all of these forces that are trying to play puppet master in our lives, which ones matter? Which ones should we follow? Which ones should we destroy? Do we even have a choice anymore? Does it really matter if God or Alexa wins the war for the human heart and soul? While I’m not sure that the creators of “Mrs. Davis” have the answer to that question, it gives me a bit of faith in the future of TV that they’re around to ask it.

Whole season screened for review. Launches April 21 on Peacock.

Brian Tallerico

Brian Tallerico is the Managing Editor of RogerEbert.com, and also covers television, film, Blu-ray, and video games. He is also a writer for Vulture, The Playlist, The New York Times, and GQ, and the President of the Chicago Film Critics Association.

3 minutes ago

about 1 hour ago

about 22 hours ago

1 day ago

Read Entire Article